Given current technology offshore wind turbines are feasible
to a depth of 30 meters. New technology exists to site wind turbines to a depth
of 50 meters while 100 meter technology is on the horizon. Considering this,
offshore wind turbines are feasible from Cape Cod,
Massachusetts to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina.
The benefits and costs of wind farms off the Outer Banks of
North Carolina should be considered as part of the North Carolina energy policy making process.
Wind farm benefits include reductions in carbon emissions and improved fishery
habitat. Wind farm costs include a potential change in visual amenities, bird
habitat loss, lost property values, and lost coastal recreation and tourism
values. The magnitudes of these benefits and costs are currently unknown. In an
ongoing study, Craig Landry (East
Carolina University),
Tom Allen (ECU), Todd Cherry (Appalachian State University) and myself (ASU)
are trying to estimate the impacts of coastal wind farms on recreation and
tourism.
A combination of in-person and telephone surveys is being
used to assess the trip behavior by coastal residents with and without offshore
wind farms. We have a sample of 361 respondents. We first asked a few general
questions about climate change: 72% of respondents are concerned about global
warming, 82% agree that man-made pollution has played a major factor in global
warming and 91% support development of offshore wind energy.
Considering coastal wind farms, 54% believe wind farms would
have a positive impact on coastal visual amenities, 88% support development of
wind energy at the beach nearest their home and 84% support development of wind
energy at all North Carolina
beaches.
One of the objections to coastal wind farms is that they
would hurt the recreation and tourism industry. So we asked for what they would
do if wind turbines were at the beach they planned to go to on their next visit:
“Now we are interested in how your beach trips might change if there are wind farms
in North Carolina.
Suppose that a wind farm is built at _____ [insert
most likely beach respondent would visit].
The wind farm has 100 windmills, standing about 400 feet high and 1 mile
from the shore. The next time you go to the beach would you still go to this
beach, a different beach without a view of a wind farm, or would you take no
beach trip at all?” 88% say that they would visit the same beach, only 6% would
visit a different beach and only 5% would not go to the beach.
Then we asked: “Now suppose that similar wind farms are
built at each of the 31 major beach towns in North Carolina. How many total beach trips
would you expect to take to North
Carolina beaches in the next 12 months?” Compared to
the number of beach trips respondents expect to take without wind farms,
visitation decreases by 7% (on average), or about 1 trip each year.
The take home message seems to be that coastal recreation
and tourism won’t be creamed with wind farms. More results are sure to follow,
so stay tuned.
Connect:
Authored by:
John Whitehead is a professor in the Department of Economics at Appalachian State University, arriving in Boone in 2004. He received his PhD from the University of Kentucky in 1990 and has worked at East Carolina University (12 years) and UNC-Wilmington (3 years). In addition to two sections of economics principles each semester, he has taught benefit-cost analysis, environmental economics, ...
See complete profile