1: Cape Wind 

The 420-megawatt Cape Wind project is big, but the expectations for it are even bigger. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who just last week announced approval for the project amidst some stiff opposition, expects the Nantucket Sound wind farm to do no less than prove the viability of offshore wind in America. Much remains to be done before the first turbine blades start to spin – bank financing and power purchase agreements must be finalized and the project must be built on time and within budget. But Cape Wind has already done a lot. The project’s developers have endured nine years of attempts to regulate offshore sites that played like a bureaucratic version of “Who’s on first?” before finally arriving at guidelines that future developers can follow. More importantly, the Obama administration has decided that the need for renewable energy trumps environmental and cultural concerns that threaten to block large projects. It’s an imperfect solution, to be sure, but it does move green energy forward.
2: President Barack
Obama
As skilled a politician as he is,
President Barack Obama has benefited from a whole heap of luck in his
career. His presidential campaign, you may
recall, reached orbit only after
the economy crashed with a Republican at the helm. So, perhaps on a
cosmic level, it was time for Obama to meet some truly rotten fortune.
And he did – when he proposed opening up large swaths of the Atlantic
and Gulf to offshore drilling just three weeks before BP’s
deep-water rig sank off the coast of Louisiana, releasing 5,000 barrels
of oil per day directly into the ocean. What does this disaster mean
for Obama’s “pan-energy” strategy? It really depends – if we have to
wait for three months for a second well to be drilled, Obama will face
intense pressure from his base to back down on offshore drilling. If
BP can block the leak soon, offshore drilling could remain politically
viable. As Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said this week, “The Challenger accident was
heartbreaking, but we went back to space.”
3: Senator
Lindsey Graham, (R-S.C.)
Is the South Carolina Republican
holding the Rosetta Stone for the climate bill? Or is it just a big,
dumb rock? Graham, the key member of the tri-partisan coalition that’s
crafting the senate climate legislation, withdrew his support last month for the group’s bill
because Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, (D-Nev.), wanted to move on
immigration reform first. Graham complained that Reid was
undercutting his bid to gain Republican support for the climate
measure. Fair enough. But even if Graham gets his way, it isn’t clear
that he’ll be able to persuade his colleagues to support the climate
bill. So, why coddle him? Because Democrats have no choice. With so
many members of their own caucus looking for concessions for industry
and coal, this bill needs at least a few Republican supporters to make
it through. Graham is the only one who can gauarantee this.
4: Codexis
Codexis, the California biofuel
developer, after raising more than $80 million from VC funds and
strategic investors, turned to the public markets to secure its next batch of
capital. While cleantech IPOs have generated quite a bit of buzz,
the reality is that with most companies in the sector lacking secure
revenues, investors are not lining up to buy stocks. Codexis, which
makes a point of highlighting that it’s not solely dependent on the
cleantech industry for its bottom line, had a tepid beginning on
the NASDAQ, where its IPO was priced at $13, on the low end of its
$13-to-$15 price range. On Tuesday, a little less than a week after
its IPO, Codexis shares were trading slightly above their offering
price, closing at $13.44. Lithium-ion battery maker A123 Systems isn’t
doing any better, closing Tuesday at $11.72, slightly above the $11.50 it issued shares for its
IPO last fall.
5: Department of Energy Cleantech Manufacturing Funding
To ensure that the cleantech
technology developed in U.S. labs actually ends up creating jobs, the
Obama administration is leaving no stone unturned. Hence, last month the Department of Energy announced
a $200 million program to support technologies that improves the
manufacturing processes involved in making solar panels or even wind
turbines. The goal is to cut production costs so that America’s green
economy is actually “made in the U.S.A. ” and not off-shored to
cheaper places. These days while the U.S. is churning out some of the
most innovative clean energy technologies, a growing number of clean
energy businesses are relocating manufacturing lines to China and
other cheaper production centers. That’s what BP did last month when
it closed its sole U.S. PV panel plant. EverGreen Solar is exporting
its homegrown technology to China where it’s building a 500 megawatt
production plant. In its quest for a green-collar economy, the Obama
administration wants ensure that U.S. cleantech technology translate into American
jobs.
6: First Solar
With key European cleantech markets
tightening (Germany is set to cut its solar subsidies; Spain looking
to do the same), thin-film PV panel maker First Solar is turning to its
home market to grow sales. As such, last week the company announced it was acquiering solar power
plant developer NextLight Renewable Power for $285 million. The
acquisition significantly bolsters First Solar’s project pipeline,
adding some 1,100 megawatts of utility-scale solar projects, mostly in
the U.S. southwest. Analysts praised the deal for the positive impact
it will have on First Solar’s medium-to-long term revenues. In its
space these day First Solar is one of the few companies that can
afford to literally buy market shares. As it looks to monetize its PV production, expect
more such deals from the Tempe, Ariz., company.
7: The Cleantech
Capitalists
Emboldened by long-term government
support, venture capitalists have been investing large swaths of cash
in cleantech companies. According to recent figures from the National
Venture Capital Association, during the first quarter, venture capital
and private equity funds invested $2.9 billion in renewable energy
companies, compared to $1.7 billion in the last quarter and $1.6
billion in the first quarter of 2009. While the investment levels have
not recovered from the peaks of a couple of years ago, cleantech is
attracting a majority of VC and PE investment dollars these days —
that’s over straight technology startups. Of concern though is that the
pool of cash is far smaller than in years past and that’s a bad news
for cash-hungry cleantech startups.
8: Amonix
Amonix, the Seal Beach,
Calif.-based maker of concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) solar power systems, closed a $129.4 million Series B
funding deal led by Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers. The
value of the deal is a stark reminder of the steep capital requirements
of clean energy companies, which can raise as much cash in a single
round as a straight technology company does over multiple financing
rounds. The question remains though, can venture capital firms keep
up the pace? Right now investors are keeping their purses open because
they are confident the government will remain a funding
partner for the forseable future. Were government support to
waver, venture funds would likely be less generous, making it harder
for companies like Amonix secure investment capital.
9: Joe Romm, Center for American Progress
Blam! Kapow! Zowie! Joe Romm! This
is meant as a compliment to Mr. Romm, whose new book about climate change politics and policy,
Straight Up, reaffirms his status as the blogosphere’s punchiest
voice on global warming. Romm, who describes himself as “America’s
fiercest climate blogger,” takes on the right and climate skeptics with
gusto. But he’s at his best when attacking wishy-washy centrists and
pseudo-progressives. Straight Up’s indictment of “status-quo media”
like The New York Times lays bare the inadequacies of traditional
he-said-she-said media coverage when faced with a civilizational
challenge like climate change. Perhaps more impressively, Romm wasn’t afraid to turn on President Obama
after Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., withdrew his support for a climate
bill in a political maneuver on immigration reform. Obama, Romm wrote,
“cannot possibly be a successful president from a historical
perspective if he doesn’t have a domestic climate bill.” Strong
opinions, muscular writing.
10: Jan Van Dokkum, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Buyers
If you’re an ambitious cleantech
startup looking for capital, remember this name: Jan Van Dokkum. He joined Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Buyers last
month as a partner in charge of overseeing the firm’s growing
cleantech portfolio. He comes to the Silicon Valley heavyweight with
deep industry knowledge, having previously headed fuel cell developer
UTC Power. The hiring underscores how important cleantech has become to Kleiner Perkins,
which in a previous life built itself as a leading straight
technology investor. As a partner, Van Dokkum will have a say on how
the firm’s portfolio companies invest their venture dollars and grow
into viable, money making businesses, something that only a few
cleantech companies have been able to do so far.
Link to original post




















JonathanFoxrun said:
As the Gulf Oil Tragedy worsens, two things occur to me. First is the ineptitude of humans to control outcomes of their mechanical invasions upon Mother Earth. Second is the vulnerability of waters to this destructive folly. In a genuine lack of wisdom, the US has once again decided to go beyond where it should go - this time by Salazar approving Cape Wind. He just slated Nantucket Sound's fragile ecosystem for an electrical service platform with a helicopter pad, fuel, transformer oil, greases, and industrial lubricants - tens of thousands of gallons of them about 4 miles offshore in those waters. With an increase in predicted severe weather events already taking place, prospects of nor'easters on steroids just doesn't bode well for offshore wind farms in their path. Has Mr. Salazar and Minerals Management just made a budgetary decision on how to kill the waters? Why use premium crude oil when tens of thousands of gallons of alternative industrial fluids will work just as well? People, offshore wind farms are not benign pinwheels. They are industrial power plants that can pollute just as much as any man-made beast. Our life-giving waters should not be squandered like this.
- reply
- 0 points
Fri, 2010-05-07 00:56 — Jonathan FoxrunPost new comment