One of my long time heroes, Ted Rockwell, stole the show and conducted school on many topics during the session. Here is his response to Senator Alexander's question about safely storing used nuclear fuel. I love the crowd reaction at the end - he elicited a very nice smile from an audience member who seemed to be trying to keep a straight face.
Ted's response is one that you have read here on several occasions, and it is one that is gaining increasing traction with technically minded people like NNadir, the infamously grouchy chemist who posts great diaries on Daily Kos about the value of the by-products of atomic fission. That material is simply too valuable to bury it underground. It is a terrible waste of money to spend billions to do something that people in the future will want to pay additional billions to undo.




















RodAdams said:
- reply
- 0 points
Thu, 2009-07-02 16:27 — RodAdamsRobin Carey said:
- reply
- 0 points
Thu, 2009-07-02 15:57 — Robin CareyTeedRockwell said:
- reply
- 0 points
Thu, 2009-07-02 14:39 — TeedRockwellBillWoods said:
- reply
- 0 points
Fri, 2009-06-26 14:07 — BillWoodsGeoffrey Styles said:
Rod,
Great stuff, and you've inspired me to watch his entire testimony, which is languishing in the email folder in which I keep all the PR missives I receive as a blogger.
For me, the nuclear waste question comes down to a simple choice. Would we rather sequester 800 million tons per year of CO2 (the emissions we'd get if US nuclear power plants burned coal instead of uranium) or 2,000 tons per year of spent nuclear fuel?
- reply
- 0 points
Fri, 2009-06-26 09:42 — Geoffrey StylesPost new comment