Just when you thought the news in Copenhagen couldn't get worse, a brand new paper released in Nature suggests that the polar ice sheets are more vulnerable to global warming than previously feared.  2 degrees Celsius of global warming could commit us to 6-9 meters (20-30 feet) of long-term sea level rise.

The study is based on an extensive database of geological indicators for the last interglacial period, roughly 125,000 years ago, when polar temperatures were about 3-5 degrees Celsius warmer than today, as is expected if global warming hits 2-3 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.  

Released just as Copenhagen negotiations hit peak intensity, the findings reinforce that the developed world needs to be prepared to fund significant adaptation support, particularly for low-lying countries such as Bangladesh. 

"The findings underscore the need for preparation, beginning now, to deal with the impacts of sea-level rise," co-author Professor Michael Oppenheimer of Princeton University and former EDF Chief Scientist said today, "and reinforces the logic behind a 2 degree target...we find that the level of polar warming expected to accompany 2 degrees warming is sufficient...for major impacts."

"Whether the catastrophic scenario plays out or not, we need to prepare now for significant sea-level rise," Oppenheimer added.

Although the data doesn't allow the researchers to predict precisely when temperature rise will be high enough to trigger massive melting equivalent to the past interglacial period, "the intelligent thing to do is act as rapidly as reasonably possible," says Oppenheimer.   

Oppenheimer did not comment on how much adaptation money needs to be on the negotiating table, but he expects that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's financing offer this morning will spur additional funding commitments and act as "political lubricant to grease the wheels to reach an agreement" in Copenhagen. 

The paper has three main scientific findings:

1) warm the ice sheets to the level of the last interglacial period for some amount of time and significant ice sheet disintegration will occur;

2) the rate of ice sheet disintegration will be very large compared to the sea-level rise scientists have been predicting;

3) both ice sheets were involved during past warming events 

As reported in more detail by Princeton University:

A new analysis of the geological record of the Earth's sea level, carried out by scientists at Princeton and Harvard universities and published in the Dec. 16 issue of Nature, employs a novel statistical approach that reveals the planet's polar ice sheets are vulnerable to large-scale melting even under moderate global warming scenarios. Such melting would lead to a large and relatively rapid rise in global sea level.

According to the analysis, an additional 2 degrees of global warming could commit the planet to 6 to 9 meters (20 to 30 feet) of long-term sea level rise. This rise would inundate low-lying coastal areas where hundreds of millions of people now reside. It would permanently submerge New Orleans and other parts of southern Louisiana, much of southern Florida and other parts of the U.S. East Coast, much of Bangladesh, and most of the Netherlands, unless unprecedented and expensive coastal protection were undertaken. And while the researchers' findings indicate that such a rise would likely take centuries to complete, if emissions of greenhouse gases are not abated, the planet could be committed during this century to a level of warming sufficient to trigger this outcome.

The study, "Probabilistic Assessment of Sea Level During the Last Interglacial Stage," was written by Robert Kopp, who conducted the work as a postdoctoral researcher in Princeton's Department of Geosciences and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs; Frederik Simons, an assistant professor of geosciences at Princeton; Jerry Mitrovica, a professor of geophysics at Harvard; Adam Maloof, an assistant professor of geosciences at Princeton; and Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geosciences and international affairs in Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School.

As part of the study, the researchers compiled an extensive database of geological sea level indicators for a period known as the last interglacial stage about 125,000 years ago. Polar temperatures during this stage were likely 3 to 5 degrees Celsius (5 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than today, as is expected to occur in the future if temperatures reach about 2 to 3 degrees Celsius (about 4 to 6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

"The last interglacial stage provides a historical analog for futures with a fairly moderate amount of warming; the high sea levels during the stage suggest that significant chunks of major ice sheets could disappear over a period of centuries in such futures," Kopp said. "Yet if the global economy continues to depend heavily on fossil fuels, we're on track to have significantly more warming by the end of century than occurred during the last interglacial. I find this somewhat worrisome."

Oppenheimer added, "Despite the uncertainties inherent in such a study, these findings should send a strong message to the governments negotiating in Copenhagen that the time to avoid disastrous outcomes may run out sooner than expected."

Previous geological studies of sea level benchmarks such as coral reefs and beaches had shown that, at many localities, local sea levels during the last interglacial stage were higher than today. But local sea levels differ from those in this earlier stage; one major contributing factor is that the changing masses of the ice sheets alter the planet's gravitational field and deform the solid Earth. As a consequence, inferring global sea level from local geological sea level markers requires a geographically broad data set, a model of the physics of sea level, and a means to integrate the two. The study's authors provide all three, integrating the data and the physics with a statistical approach that allows them to assess the probability distribution of past global sea level and its rate of change.

The researchers determined through their analysis that there is a 95 percent probability that, during the last interglacial stage, global sea level peaked more than 6.6 meters (22 feet) above its present level. They further found that it is unlikely (with a 33 percent probability) that global sea level during this period exceeded 9.4 meters (31 feet).

Sea levels during the last interglacial stage are of interest to scientists and important to policymakers for several reasons. Most notably, the last interglacial stage is relatively recent by geological standards, making it feasible for climate scientists to develop a credible sea level record for the period, and is the most recent time period when average global temperatures and polar temperatures were somewhat higher than today. Because it was slightly warmer, the period can help scientists understand the stability of polar ice sheets and the future rate of sea level rise under low to moderate global warming scenarios.

The findings indicate that sea level during the last interglacial stage rose for centuries at least two to three times faster than the recent rate, and that both the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheet likely shrank significantly and made important contributions to sea level rise. However, the relative timing of temperature change and sea level change during the last interglacial stage is fairly uncertain, so it is not possible to infer from the analysis how long an exposure to peak temperatures during this stage was needed to commit the planet to peak sea levels.

[Editor's disclosure: Professor Michael Oppenheimer is my Ph.D. Advisor, and first-author of the paper, Robert Kopp, is a good friend and colleague] 

Rebecca Lutzy is reporting live from Copenhagen.  Rebecca is the Content and Community Manager of The Energy Collective and a Ph.D. candidate in Princeton University's Science, Technology and Environmental Policy program.