Comments by Severin Borenstein Subscribe

On Money for Nothing?

Thanks Nathan.  I think the answer is to offer time-varying pricing on an optional basis, preferably an opt-out basis.  People who want can still have a flat rate, but they will be pooled with others who want a flat rate, who might have a more costly load profile.  I outline this approach in a paper at  By the way, SMUD has run an opt-out pilot for critical-peak pricing that has been very successful (over 90% choose to stay with it).  The report on that is linked towards the end of this blog.

May 14, 2014    View Comment