Sign up | Login with →
Posted by: David Hone

Short and long term strategies

Like it?
4

I have been at the first Doha Carbon and Energy Forum this week, organized by Qatar Petroleum and the Qatar Foundation with support from ExxonMobil. The event focused on steps that could be taken in Qatar and the region to begin to address the issue of carbon emissions. Sessions on carbon capture and storage, energy efficiency and alternative energy each produced a set of proposals to take forward.

There is no doubt that the Gulf region is very aware of the issue of climate change and its implications, particularly the potential economic impact going forward as the world looks to alternative energy sources. In Qatar there is also a feeling of optimism because of the very substantial natural gas reserves there. But there is also a realization that a very well thought through strategic approach will be required to capitalize on the long term value of the resource in an increasingly carbon constrained world.

In the short to medium term natural gas offers a real opportunity for nations to quickly get to grips with emissions targets and begin to see reductions within the economy. This is showing up very clearly in the USA, where rapidly increasing shale-gas production, in combination with tougher emission standards in the coal sector (other than CO2 that is)  is pushing the USA towards its 17% Copenhagen Accord target even without the benefit of federal carbon emissions legislation. A quick “back of the envelope” calculation shows that if the USA replaces 120 GW of coal fired power generating capacity (about a third of the fleet) with natural gas, in combination with the tough new laws on vehicle efficiency, it can, at least on paper, meet its 2020 target. There are a few ifs and buts here of course, with the key ones being as follows;

  • The background to the coal to gas switch is discussed in a previous posting, “A Focus on the USA – Coal and Natural Gas”.
  • On-road vehicle efficiency needs to improve by about 10 mpg at constant miles driven. In 2005 average on-road vehicle efficiency remained around 20 mpg, so that means about 30 mpg by 2020. In theory this is possible given vehicle turnover and the new mileage standards.
  • Other emissions across the economy need to remain the same – e.g. emissions from industry and homes.

The early evidence is that the change is already underway in the power sector, which has seen a sharp drop in CO2 intensity over the last three years.

Such a strategy pays off handsomely in the medium term and offers natural gas the position as a transition fuel to a low carbon economy. But this is not sustainable in the longer term as emission reduction targets become much tougher. This is why the USA, for example, needs emissions legislation now, not so much for the period up to 2020 which is now largely set, but for the energy mix in the decades afterwards which will be set by decisions made in the next 5-10 years.

Similarly, for a country such as Qatar with a large natural gas resource base, carbon constraints around the world offer opportunity now, but will be challenging later on. The forum in Doha recognized this and proposed an increased focus on carbon capture and storage and the role that it could play in allowing natural gas to remain a key part of the global energy mix for much of this century – in other words to be as much a destination fuel as it is a transition fuel. The development of a Gulf region CCS Technology Platform with a focus on CCS+NG demonstration plants was tabled as a potential way forward.



» Already a member? Login now to comment!

» Not a member? Register to comment!

Like it?
4
Dr. Strangegas said:

Exxon threw its weight eg in this 2003 story behind the climate denial machine for many years.  By 2007 they tried to tell us  we were wrong to take them at their word that they were the biggest of the big time deniers in existence.  They said "they've never denied the existence of climate change". 

And of course, now, as you say, ExxonMobil is supporting grand conferences on how the Middle East can address carbon emissions.  

Funny how now that Exxon is getting into the gas business in the biggest way it can,  it sponsors conferences that conclude that gas is going to be the transition fuel and the destination fuel.  The conclusions are coincidental, ExxonMobil assures us.  Or they would, but who is asking? 

It all sounds so sincere. 

And as you say, it would be better if the USA had an economy wide cap-and-trade policy that was stopped by the fossil fuel industry, i.e. ExxonMobil etc.  

Its just business, eh?  They've got to stop cap and trade otherwise their products lose market share to nukes and renewables, and they just can't have that.  They invest in gas because even they know they won't be able to stop an aroused public pushing politicians to act once the sh*t starts really hitting the fan, although the gas play is fairly pure economics now.  They told us they didn't believe there was a problem all these years, then they told us they never told us that, and they'll be telling us they told us to stop them from destroying the planet but we wouldn't listen when we tell them we're going to put them all in jail. 

Once the planet is destroyed, we'll all realize the paymasters weren't even human beings.  If one human being won't make the decision ExxonMobil needs to make the most profit, he'll be gone in a heartbeat so the next one will.

Mon, 2010-11-15 02:19 — Dr. Strangegas
Like it?
4
DavidHone said:

There is no doubt that the global response to rising levels of CO2 and the impact it will have falls far short of the necessary response. But there are at least the makings of a widespread understanding and recognition of the need for action. Four or five years ago in the same region the typical response was very different and often very negative. So significant  progress has been made, but more is needed.

Similarly in the USA it would be far better had an economy wide cap-and-trade been created, but showing that the current US 2020 pledge can at least be met by some course of action (even if not all agree that it is the right one) hopefully keeps the offer on the table which in turn keeps other nations at the table. Without that, there is little hope of any real progress at all.

Sun, 2010-11-14 17:16 — DavidHone
Like it?
4
Geant Erreur said:

"...is that what we have in mind: to delay Armageddon for three years? Is that really it?"  - Bill Gates, interview published in Technology Review, August 24, 2010

The assumption behind all the talk you are reporting filled the conference hall at Doha is that civilization can handle whatever will happen as warming proceeds beyond 2 degrees C as a result of CO2 accumulation being allowed to build up to a level greater than 450 ppm. 

"Is that all there is" sung by Peggy Lee, slightly modified, runs through my mind: 

Is that what the effort is going to do?  Give civilization three more years?  Is that all?

Is that all there is, is that all there is
If that's all there is my friends, then let's keep dancing
Let's break out the coal and burn it all
If that's all there is

Imagine yourself at a conference on what to do about rising militarism in Japan and Germany during the 1930s, before the US entered WWII.  Boy Scout troops training with wooden sticks is a transition strategy?  Upping the defence budget by 1% is a destination strategy?  When it finally dawned on people what was at stake the plans became realistic. 

Are you assuming that civilization will never wake up to what is at stake? 

 

Sun, 2010-11-14 14:11 — Geant Erreur
Like it?
4
DavidHone said:

There is no doubt that the global response to rising levels of CO2 and the impact it will have falls far short of the necessary response. But there are at least the makings of a widespread understanding and recognition of the need for action. Four or five years ago in the same region the typical response was very different and often very negative. So significant  progress has been made, but more is needed.

Similarly in the USA it would be far better had an economy wide cap-and-trade been created, but showing that the current US 2020 pledge can at least be met by some course of action (even if not all agree that it is the right one) hopefully keeps the offer on the table which in turn keeps other nations at the table. Without that, there is little hope of any real progress at all.

Sun, 2010-11-14 15:23 — DavidHone