A poll reported in this morning's Wall St. Journal (subscription) indicated that more Americans are significantly affected by high gas prices than by rising food prices, falling home values, unemployment or foreclosures. That's a surprising result, considering that transportation fuel only accounts for about 5% of average household expenses. However, gasoline has one of the most visible prices in our society, and the scale of our fuel use is such that price increases of the recent magnitude aggregate to a very large total. Based on year-to-date prices and compared to a more typical year like 2006, the drag on the US economy is running between $100 and $150 billion for 2011, reversing any "gasoline stimulus" we received in 2009.
As of the latest price report from the Department of Energy's Energy Information Agency, the national average price for unleaded regular gasoline has dropped back to $3.71 per gallon from its May peak of just under $4. Despite that, it's still more than a buck higher than this time last year. In fact, until a couple of weeks ago gas prices were trending well above their path in 2008, when prices reached an all-time high of $4.11/gal. that July. (See above chart.) When I compared this year's prices to those in 2006, which averaged only about 20 cents per gallon lower than last year's but exhibited more normal seasonality, and then multiplied by the more than 137 billion gallons of gasoline the US is likely to consume this year, the total drag on the economy worked out to between $100 and $150 billion on a full-year basis. (See chart below.) If these prices persisted, that would be enough to negate the effect of the entire 2% cut in Social Security taxes for 2011.
Fortunately, barring an escalation of the current supply disruptions in the Middle East, a major hurricane affecting Gulf Coast refinery operations, or an unexpected surge in economic growth, we've probably either already seen the peak gasoline price for the year or are within a few weeks of it. The outcome of last week's OPEC meeting, while not as bearish for prices as an agreement to increase quotas and output would have been, has had little lasting effect on oil prices, which are running at a level consistent with this week's US average pump price or a bit less. However, no one should confuse a seasonal easing in prices with a permanent return to cheaper gas. Short of another global economic crisis, global oil supply and demand remain closely enough matched that any hiccup will quickly translate into higher prices at the pump. I feel safe in predicting that we'll be flirting with $4 again before long, and the consequences of that should be factored into any forecasts of future economic growth.
Gasoline Could Cost Consumers an Extra $150 Billion in 2011
Other Posts by Geoffrey Styles
E15's Problems Are Symptomatic of A Failing Biofuels Policy - May 22, 2012
Are Chesapeake's Problems A Red Flag For Shale Gas? - May 17, 2012
Where Gas is Already $10 per Gallon - May 9, 2012
Resources from Space? - May 4, 2012
US Natural Gas Price Nears $10 per Barrel Equivalence - April 30, 2012
» Already a member? Login now to comment!
» Not a member? Register to comment!
Don Madden said:
I feel safe in predicting that we'll be flirting with $4 again before long, and the consequences of that should be factored into any forecasts of future economic growth.
This is really the crux of the matter isn't it. Energy prices are going to go up.
As business people we need to protect ourselves so that we and those who work for us can prosper in this new energy economic order. We can't wait for government incentives. From building owners to auto fleet owners, each is going to have to individually put a plan together to minimize the impact of higher energy prices..... before they suddenly appear.
What is your plan? Have you done an energy audit?
What is your timeline? The sooner the better.
Don Madden
www.tarafinance.com
Amelia Timbers said:
I agree. Arguments against or for different types of energy based on price are unpersuasive to me for this reason; all our power will be more expensive, oil and otherwise, in coming years. I also totally agree Don that anticipatory business planning is crucial. Indeed, I expect energy cost inflation to be a determing factor in chapter 13s in upcoming years.
Geoffrey Styles said:
"all our power will be more expensive, oil and otherwise"
Amelia, I'd have agreed wholeheartedly a few years ago. It's almost certainly still the case for oil and its products, based on the prospects for additional supply vs. the potential demand growth. However, I'm less sure when it comes to electricity. Consider that the main competition that's setting up is between a fuel that has become surprisingly cheap and a group of technologies that are widely expected to become cheaper in the future. The fuel is natural gas, which in the US at least has completely disconnected from the price of oil and now sells for an astonishing 65% discount to oil on an energy-equivalent basis--and I'm not talking about prices for delivery this month; this is on the basis of futures prices for delivery in June 2016, backed by massive conventional and unconventional gas resources. And gas is what wind, solar and to a lesser extent geothermal will be competing with to supply the marginal MWh in many markets. In that dynamic, what's going to drive prices higher, unless renewables are forced into the market on the basis of mechanisms that don't reward efficiency--European-style feed-in tariffs being one example?
Amelia Timbers said:
Geoff, what did you think of David Thorpe's Feed In Tarriff post? http://theenergycollective.com/david-k-thorpe/59363/feed-tariffs-fiasco And are you at all concerned about a peak natural gas scenario? Natural gas has serious emissions consequences, re your own post; I am hopeful that we find a better way to incorporate renewables.
Geoffrey Styles said:
Amelia, I read the post on FITs in the UK. As I understand it, there are two issues invovled: one is a transition from the current Renewable Obligation Certfificate scheme (which is similar to US state renewable portfolio standards) to an FIT. The other is the high level of FIT necessary to incentivize solar investment in the UK, which if anything has an even worse potential for solar than Germany, except for Cornwall. I'm afraid Mr. Thorpe is being optimistic if he thinks an extensive FIT-based program will cost UK ratepayers only £3/mo. The cost in Germany is already much higher.
As for Peak Gas, I'm sure there's some level of gas utilization that would challenge our ability to pull gas out of the ground fast enough, but until the enormous global shale resources are all being tapped, that day looks very far off. It's also not obvious that there's a true gas analogy to peak oil, because the quantity of methane tied up in the earth's crust and in methane hydrates in the oceans is orders of magnitude larger.
As for the emissions, if you mean the emissions from leakage that Howarth has focused on, most of that is amenable to control by improved drilling practices and technology. That's not just my view, but also the conclusion of MIT and others. And new lifecycle analysis from the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) found that even on a 20-year GWP horizon, natural-gas fired power plants emit 50% less GHG than coal-fired plants. Considering that the power sector generates at least a third of US GHG emissions, a 50% cut there would be huge.
-
Baby You Can Drive My (Electric) Car
Posted May 11, 2012 by Scott Edward Anderson
-
Siemens develops ABS plastic alternative
Posted May 9, 2012 by Doris de Guzman
-
Reduce CO2 and Slow Global Warming?
Posted April 30, 2012 by Willem Post
-
Hidroenergia 2012
May 23, 2012, Wroclaw, Poland
-
WGC 2012 - 25th World Gas Conference
June 4, 2012, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
-
Ecwatech 2012
June 4, 2012, Moscow, Russia
Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »
Marc Gunther is a writer, speaker and consultant, who focuses on business and the environment. More »
Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »
Jesse Jenkins is the director of energy and climate policy at the Breakthrough Institute. More »
Robert Rapier works in the energy industry and writes and speaks about energy and the environment. More »
Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »
Dan Yurman is a nuclear energy blogger and writes regularly for Fuel Cycle Week. More »
The Energy Collective
- YOU
- Rod Adams
- Scott Edward Anderson
- Charles Barton
- Barry Brook
- Dick DeBlasio
- Simon Donner
- Big Gav
- Michael Giberson
- James Greenberger
- Lou Grinzo
- Marc Gunther
- Tyler Hamilton
- Christine Hertzog
- David Hone
- Jesse Jenkins
- Lynne Kiesling
- Sonita Lontoh
- Jesse Parent
- Vicky Portwain
- Tom Raftery
- Robert Rapier
- Joseph Romm
- Robert Stavins
- Robert Stowe
- Geoffrey Styles
- Alex Trembath
- Gernot Wagner
- John Whitehead
- Dan Yurman
Hidroenergia 2012
When: Wed, 2012-05-23 09:00
NERC CIP Compliance Training
When: Thu, 2012-05-24 08:00
Webinar on Transported Asset Protection Association’s (TAPA) Freight Security Requirements and Trucking Security Requirements
When: Thu, 2012-05-24 14:00
Global JOJOBAWORLD 2012
When: Fri, 2012-05-25 09:00
NESCO Town Hall: Security Risk Management Practices for Electric Utilities
When: Wed, 2012-05-30 13:00
Ecwatech 2012
When: Mon, 2012-06-04 09:00

About Social Media Today




