A few Christmases ago, I published this email from Santa, which arrived on the night before the night before Christmas. Readers had so much fun with it, it's become an annual tradition. Enjoy!
Happy Holidays!
Scott, aka The Green Skeptic
About Social Media Today
The world's best thinkers on the urban future
The world's best thinkers on business intelligence & data analytics
The world's best thinkers on the healthy enterprise
The world's best thinkers on healthcare
The world's best thinkers on venture funding and growth
The world's best thinkers on e-government and open democracy
The world's best thinkers on social media
A few Christmases ago, I published this email from Santa, which arrived on the night before the night before Christmas. Readers had so much fun with it, it's become an annual tradition. Enjoy!
Authored by:
Scott Edward Anderson is currently global marketing director for cleantech at Ernst & Young. He is the founder of the popular blog, The Green Skeptic, and the VerdeStrategy consultancy. He has held management positions with Ashoka and The Nature Conservancy and is co-founder of the Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic. An award-winning poet, Scott was a John Sawhill Conservation Leadership Fellow, ...
Two references for climate debaters on both side:
1. "In summary, neither our model projections for the 21st century nor our analyses of trends in Atlantic hurricane and tropical storm counts over the past 120+ yr support the notion that greenhouse gas-induced warming leads to large increases in either tropical storm or overall hurricane numbers in the Atlantic. A new modeling study projects a large (~100%) increase in Atlantic category 4-5 hurricanes over the 21st century, but we estimate that this increase may not be detectable until the latter half of the century." (http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes).
2. Today's Dilbert in the WP. (http://www.uclick.com/client/wpc/dt/?wpisrc=nl_tech)
What is the pont of discussing climate change when the global temperature is acknowledged by practically all who should know, as not changing over the last 16 years within 95% confidence levels?
There should be no more spending on GHG reduction schemes until the scientists work out why the temperature is constant while GHG are rising faster than ever.
Major public policy should not be made when the maths are wrong.
Scott,
Eliminating fossil fuels to reduce CO2 emissions, with their consumption increasing in developing nations for at least the next 4-5 decades, will be a tall order. In fact, it is not just a pipe dream, but a costly, irrational delusion.
GW is occurring. It started in the late 1700s when the LIA became less severe. By 1850 the negative temperature anomaly became zero and then became positive.
By the late 1880s, CO2 started to rise. Any GW due to CO2 came after that time.
The world is going to do what it does. Mankind is influencing it at the margins.
The below articles explain all in detail.
http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/83704/reduce-co2-and-slow-global-warming
http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/155681/co2-emissions-and-chevy-volt-vs-honda-civic-ex-l
http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/89476/wind-energy-co2-emissions-are-overstated
http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/107316/global-warming-coal-combustion-and-sea-level-rise
http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/151031/global-warming-targets-and-capital-costs-germany-s-energiewende
Below is my article on the Chevy Volt and its CO2 emission reduction WRT to 60% efficient CCGTs. It had 1,650 views and 104 comments in 2 weeks.
http://theenergycollective.com/willem-post/155681/co2-emissions-and-chevy-volt-vs-honda-civic-ex-l
A base- loaded 500 MW CCGT plant replacing a base loaded 500 MW coal plant would have an annual CO2 emission reduction equivalent to 3,836,497 Chevy Volts, each traveling 12,000 miles/yr on their batteries.
Subsidizing Chevy Volts is an inequitable, expensive folly.
Wow, Santa sure has taken the climate debate to a new low. Climate skeptics are now “just plan evil”? This rhetoric could succeed in definitely converting Santa believers into non-Santa believers. Or is your post intended to continue denying the opinions of those who dare question that all climate related predictions may have confidence levels slightly less than 100%? It’s a shame that Santa can’t figure out how to better persuade those with differing opinions on extremely complex issues rather than demonizing them repeatedly in hope that this negative strategy will somehow convince intelligent individuals to reconsider their positions.
Happy Holidays. Unfortunately it does not appear the New Year will begin with a more positive approach to facilitating mature discussions on the climate or related subjects.
I think there have always been lots of climate disaster deniers on the big coal and oil payroll. It's always been tough to wade through their stuff, and refute, and thank goodness they are less in number now. It's a waste of time reading their dribble. People who are paid to spout rubbish for profit are Ho Ho Ho's.
Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »
Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »
Gary Hunt Gary is an Executive-in-Residence at Deloitte Investments with extensive experience in the energy & utility industries. More »
Jesse Jenkins is a graduate student and researcher at MIT with expertise in energy technology, policy, and innovation. More »
Jim Pierobon helps trade associations/NGOs, government agencies and companies communicate about cleaner energy solutions. More »
Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »
The Energy Collective
| Climate Change Energy Innovation Energy Storage | Smart Grid Cleantech Social Media & Energy | Nuclear Energy Fukushima |