Is the Sky Falling for Cleantech Investment?
Authored by:
Scott Edward Anderson
Scott Edward Anderson is currently global marketing director for cleantech at Ernst & Young. He is the founder of the popular blog, The Green Skeptic, and the VerdeStrategy consultancy. He has held management positions with Ashoka and The Nature Conservancy and is co-founder of the Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic. An award-winning poet, Scott was a John Sawhill Conservation Leadership Fellow, ...
Other Posts by Scott Edward Anderson
» Already a member? Login now to comment!
» Not a member? Register to comment!
Kent Otho Doering says:
The problem with private equity is that it is always looking for maximum return on investment, and is "fickle", shifting from one branch to the other.
Thus, long term "sustainability projects" must be partically government financed paired with "corporate forward financing" from major supplier "financial serevices" such as General Electric, Alstrom, Philipps, or Siemens.
I already responded by describing a E TALLY program- in "Do we need an eco - tax"
Many continental European coutnries have a three tiered, parallel public banking system at local, regional, and national levels. For example, here in Germany, raising the net carbon tax by 1 percent to a 6 % net carbon eco tax - is significant. Then, take a full 33.3 % of that eco-carbon tax... and leverage that through German three tiered parallel public banks on a 1 to 10 basis to give low interest rate- forward financing on the research and development, production set up, production, and installation of a broad synergy of energy efficiency and renewable energy measures can provide a massive 100 Billion Euros per annum in leveraged eco-tax forward financing for the sustainability sector fast build out which the private sector cannot possibly raise.
We have the two instruments - a functioning tri-level parallel public banking system, and we have a carbon eco tax we can raise another 1 percent. Then we take 33% of the eco-tax and leverage that through the parallel public banks on 1 to 10 basis just like private banks use equity to leverage on a 1 to 10 basis on which to base their loans.
The private bank system overheated - with things such as "credit derviate swaps, or "point a month" collateral rents, which was a very tricky thing financing a u.S. economy based on real estate inflation.
A leveraged eco tax system will strengthen the European parallel public banking sector which was badly stung by the credit derivate swap scams etcetera coming out of the U.S.A. .
There is no "economic law" which states you cannot take a tax of any kind, and leverage it on a 1 to 10 basis through a parallel public bank to forward finance loans or bond purchases. The "Bismarckean" system was really developed by Henry Charles Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln, for financing the Union war effort. So there is excellent precedence for this. The U.S. system was privatized under Woodrow Wilson in 1913. The European copies of the system remained intact as "parallel public banks".
A German E-.TALLY program, i.e. leveraging a portion of the eco tax through parallel public banks, will create 100 billion Euros a year in low interest rate capital for forward financing the production set up, production, and installation of a broad synergy of sustainability technologies which will further cut fossil fuel consumption by at least
6% per annum.
A pan European eco tax as liquid leveraged equity i.e. leveraging a protion of various European nation eco-taxes through their respective paralllel public banking systems- would raise about €500 billion in lendable equity for forward financing the European contributions in the "Global War Against Global Warmng." AAs the short, medium and long term loans amortize, that creates more capital for the E-TALLY programs.
E-TALLY - Eco-Tax As Liquid Levgeraged Equity - solves the problem of forward financing for various needed "sustainaiblity" projects at low interest rates. it is a non-deficit, "bastard keynesian" sustainability stimulous program. E.P.E. systems- European Public Equity programs, can step in and fill forward financing gaps that private equity cannot and will not fulfill. One these programs are in place, private equity will flow into the companies most likely to enefit from the E.P.E. programs.
E-TAllY ( (c) 2008, KOD, Munich) creates public equity for the rapid build out of fossil fuel reducing sstainability technologies. (See my other comments on today´s page- under "Do We Need an Eco Tax.)
The U.S. and Canada do not currently look as if they could pass such an E-TALLY legislation. However, continental Europe is in a position to pass such legislation, especially to get the southern part of the EEC economies moving again. A 500 Billion Euro - pan Europoean E-TALLY program will create the right conditions for a rapid build up and build out of a broad synergy of sustainability technologies which will slash European fossil fuel consumptin by 90% by 2025 with a forward financed "sustainability technology" installation worth close to 6 trillion Euros, or appr. 7.2 trillion U.S.D..
The anthropegenic climate change crisis forces us to consider a "global war against global warming." And H.C. Carey´s financial mechanisms for forward financing the Uniion war effort during the U.S. civil war can also be applied in financing the technological "general mobiilisation" of sustainability.
There is really no need to worry about adequate private equity in the continentual European sustainability sector because we have the two basic mechanisms already available to do it, eco-carbon taxes and parallel public banking systems.
E-TALLY. Eco-Tax As Liquid leveraged Equity - programs will be releasing up to 500 billion Euros per annum in low cost forward financing in the Euro zone- for the rapid build up of the sustainability sector and installing sustainability technology. The private sector in New York and London cannot meet those needs, so we can go that non-deficit, neo Keynsian sustainability stimulous route.
Thanks for writing about financing "clean tech". It is a sticky problem these days as the global economies are slowing down, and strapping the forward financing departments of big corporations installing energy and infrastructure technology. E-TALLY - will relieve companies like Siemens, G.E., Alstrom and Philipps, and provide the financing needed in the E.E.C. area for clean tech without relying on the private equity sector.
With "the boom" in shale oil and gas, and tar sand oil in Canada and the U.S., and a corresponding "lobbyist" industry engaged in "anthropegenic climate change denial" - such as we see in the "Heartlands Institute", there will be major moves to end all government support and subsidies for any kind of "clean tech" in the U.S which cuts fossil fuel consumption.
Therefore, it is up to the European Union to lead in sustainability and create new forms of forward financing for the global build up of clean tech to combat global warming. We have a carbon eco tax program, and we have parallel public banks. (originally copied from the U.S. in the 19th century before the U.S. privatized the system in 1913) (see my comments on eco-tax here.)
Financing clean tech is a problem in a "global economic crisis" economy. Therefore, an eco-tax- leveraged through parallel public banks on a 1 to 10 basis, is a sane and feasible, non-deficit forward financing program for clean tech energy efficiency and renewable energy measures.
As an outsourcer for Siemens in Germany I do enjoy this informative enlish language site sponsored by Siemens U.S.A..
Kent O. Doering, Munich
Rick Engebretson says:
I'm not sure what "venture capital" is, but following up on your links was consistent with investments in the farm belt.
A lot of news here about the housing crash protecting farmland, and about outside investors buying land at very high prices.
The investments range from communications/transportation/electric infrastructure, to water and energy efficiency (as you mentioned ).
Certainly there are many questions about choices and effects. But "green" investment is booming. And the reason is simple: that's how we stay alive.
Recommended to follow
Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »
Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »
Gary Hunt Gary is an Executive-in-Residence at Deloitte Investments with extensive experience in the energy & utility industries. More »
Jesse Jenkins is a graduate student and researcher at MIT with expertise in energy technology, policy, and innovation. More »
Jim Pierobon is the former Chief Energy & Correspondent at the Houston Chronicle, a consultant and blogs at TheEnergyFix.com More »
Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »
The Energy Collective
- YOU
- Rod Adams
- Scott Edward Anderson
- Charles Barton
- Barry Brook
- Dick DeBlasio
- Simon Donner
- Big Gav
- Michael Giberson
- James Greenberger
- Lou Grinzo
- Tyler Hamilton
- Christine Hertzog
- David Hone
- Gary Hunt
- Jesse Jenkins
- Sonita Lontoh
- Jesse Parent
- Jim Pierobon
- Vicky Portwain
- Tom Raftery
- Joseph Romm
- Robert Stavins
- Robert Stowe
- Geoffrey Styles
- Alex Trembath
- Gernot Wagner
- Dan Yurman

About Social Media Today





