The Energy Collective

The world's best thinkers on energy and climate

  • Home
  • Post Here
  • Columns
    • Electricity Markets & Policy Group
    • Full Spectrum
    • Energy and Policy Developments
    • Game Changers
    • Energy for Human Development
    • Seeking Consensus
    • Green Growth
    • New Energy Voices
  • Fuels
    • Oil
    • Wind
    • Nuclear Power
    • Coal
    • Natural Gas
    • Solar Power
    • Renewables
    • Biofuels
    • Geothermal Energy
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Hydro Power
  • Environment
    • Carbon and De-carbonization
    • International Climate Conferences
    • Sustainability
    • Climate
    • Public Health
    • Water
    • Recycling
  • Grid
    • Smart Grid
    • Electricity
  • Tech
    • Cleantech
    • Green Building
    • Storage
    • Rare Earth Minerals
  • Business and Economy
    • Cap-and-Trade
    • Agriculture
    • Efficiency
    • Green Business
    • Utilities
    • Finance
    • Green Jobs
    • Subsidies
    • Risk Management
  • Politics
    • Environmental Policy
    • Energy Security
    • Communications and Messaging
    • China
  • Transport
  • Help
    • FAQ
  • Account
    • Login
    • Register

The Truth About Natural Gas From Shale

March 26, 2012 by John McDonald

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Image

Natural gas from shale is a game-changer for the United States. 

It offers us greater control over our energy destiny, more jobs and government revenues, energy affordability, and reduced environmental impacts.  Unfortunately, there are myths associated with this resource and its method of extraction, which is why I would like to provide a simple explanation of how the process actually works to help demystify it. 

Natural gas from dense shale rock formations has become the fastest-growing source of natural gas in the United States and could become a significant new global energy source.  According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the U.S. has over 2500 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of recoverable natural gas resources – 33% of which is natural gas from shale.  In just one decade, natural gas from shale has grown to around 25% of U.S. gas production and it will nearly double by 2035.  This is significant as it will continue to provide the United States with reliable, affordable energy and present economic benefits to regions of the country such as Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan. 

Although the energy industry has long known about huge gas resources trapped in shale rock formations, it is over the past decade that energy companies have combined two established technologies—hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling—to successfully unlock this resource.

Understandably, this natural gas boom has raised some questions and concerns about how this resource is developed, including questions about the process of hydraulic fracturing and the affects, if any, on the water table.  While there is much debate and rhetoric surrounding this resource, often times a simple explanation of the process is left out of the discussion.  In an effort to help raise awareness of how natural gas from shale is extracted, here is a brief explanation: 

Once an area prospective for hydrocarbons has been determined, permission to drill is obtained from the landowner, a lease is signed, permits are secured, and environmental impact studies are conducted.  Then seismic data is gathered to determine the best location to place the well in the shale that lies deep underground. 

Once determined, a well site is constructed.  From the well site, we are able to drill multiple wells from a single site to minimize land use.  A drilling rig is then used to drill thousands of feet below the earth’s surface.  In the Marcellus Basin, wells are typically around 8,000 feet deep – nearly 7,000 feet below the water table.  The rig then drills horizontally, roughly 2,000 to 6,000 feet outward into the layer of shale rock.  Many companies use several layers of steel casing and cement to form a continuous barrier between the well and the surrounding formations.  In our Marcellus Basin wells located in Northeast United States, for example, Chevron uses up to 8 layers of steel casing and cement through the critical shallow section of the well that contains the water table to ensure the resource is extracted safely. 

Because the gas is trapped in dense shale rock, we use the process of hydraulic fracturing to allow the gas to be extracted more easily.  In hydraulic fracturing, a fluid comprised of more than 99 percent water and sand and less than 1 percent chemical additives is pumped down the well at a high pressure for a short period of time, usually a few hours. This creates a network of cracks in the shale rock that allows trapped natural gas to flow to the well. The sand helps keep the fractures open and gas flowing.  This is not a new practice.  It has been safely used since the 1940s in more than 1 million wells in the United States.  After the shale rock has been fractured, some of the hydraulic fracturing fluid is returned to the surface through the well pipe, treated and either recycled or disposed of in regulator-approved underground water injection wells. 

I support the disclosure of the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing process.  FracFocus.org is a joint website project of the Groundwater Protection Council and the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, which provides an inventory of compounds used by operators, including Chevron, in the hydraulic fracturing process in the U.S. 

Once a well is completed, a pipeline is built to take the natural gas to market to be used for electricity generation, home heating and other energy needs.  We then work with the landowner to remediate the drill site and restore the land with minimal impact to its original contours. 

After the well site has been remediated, the remaining footprint of a producing natural gas well is typically less than one acre. It includes a well head, a gas processing unit and one or two water tanks. Natural gas wells that produce from shale rock are typically expected to have a long production life spanning many years.

As is the case in other areas of our business, our ability to operate depends on public confidence in our operations.  This trust can only be earned through open, honest and timely dialogue with surrounding communities and operating at a high standard. 

Natural gas from shale can provide the U.S. with reliable, affordable, cleaner and responsibly produced energy – but we must have a supportive policy framework to encourage this development.  Doing so will help enhance the country’s energy security, strengthen local and state economies, and fuel job growth. 

Related posts:

Polls Divided on Fracking U.S. 2013 Domestic Energy Supplies Growth Scorecard: Part 1 Keystone XL Pipeline Project Update: The President Claims the Economic Benefits Will Be Minimal Top 14 Energy Stories of 2014

John McDonald

John W. McDonald is vice president and chief technology officer of Chevron Corporation, a position he assumed in January 2008. He is the corporate officer responsible for Chevron's three technology companies: Energy Technology, Information Technology and Technology Ventures. In this role, he manages the research, development and integrated application of technology throughout the company's worldwide business activities.

Filed Under: Energy, Energy and Economy, Energy Collective Exclusive, Energy Security, Natural Gas Tagged With: chevron

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

The Energy Collective Columns

Full Spectrum: Energy Analysis and Commentary with Jesse JenkinsEnergy and Policy Developments with John Miller
Game Changers column badgeEnergy for Human Development Column
Seeking Consensus with Schalk CloeteGreen Growth with Silvio Marcacci
New Energy VoicesMore coming soon...

Latest comments

  • Roger Arnold on Fuel Cell Power Plants Are Used in Diverse Ways Across the United States Actually, Bob, all fuel cells ultimately run on hydrogen. Those that nominally run on natural gas si (April 24, 2018 at 10:47 PM)
  • BobMeinetz on The Dangers of Green Technology-Forcing Schalk, whether advocacy for a carbon tax has a much higher chance of getting results is pure specul (April 24, 2018 at 10:19 PM)
  • thermoacoustic on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals Disclaimer: I live in Ohio downwind of Davis Besse and grew up with family members working in the nu (April 24, 2018 at 9:57 PM)
  • Bas Gresnigt on The Dangers of Green Technology-Forcing 60% wind capacity factors may be possible in isolated cases. However, the global average wind capaci (April 24, 2018 at 9:07 PM)

Advisory Panel

About the panel

Scott Edward Anderson is a consultant, blogger, and media commentator who blogs at The Green Skeptic. More »


Christine Hertzog is a consultant, author, and a professional explainer focused on Smart Grid. More »


Elias Hinckley is a strategic advisor on energy finance and energy policy to investors, energy companies and governments More »


Gary Hunt Gary is an Executive-in-Residence at Deloitte Investments with extensive experience in the energy & utility industries. More »


Jesse Jenkins is a graduate student and researcher at MIT with expertise in energy technology, policy, and innovation. More »


Jim Pierobon helps trade associations/NGOs, government agencies and companies communicate about cleaner energy solutions. More »


Geoffrey Styles is Managing Director of GSW Strategy Group, LLC and an award-winning blogger. More »


Featured Contributors

Rod Adams

Scott Edward Anderson

Charles Barton

Barry Brook

Steven Cohen

Dick DeBlasio

Senator Pete Domenici

Simon Donner

Big Gav

Michael Giberson

Kirsty Gogan

James Greenberger

Lou Grinzo

Jesse Grossman

Tyler Hamilton

Christine Hertzog

David Hone

Gary Hunt

Jesse Jenkins

Sonita Lontoh

Rebecca Lutzy

Jesse Parent

Jim Pierobon

Vicky Portwain

Willem Post

Tom Raftery

Joseph Romm

Robert Stavins

Robert Stowe

Geoffrey Styles

Alex Trembath

Gernot Wagner

Dan Yurman

 

 

 

Follow Us

32-linkedin 32-facebook 32-twitter 32-rss

Content for personal use only. Distribution prohibited. Republication in part or in whole is strictly prohibited. © All rights reserved Energy Central © 2018

Recent Comments

  • Roger Arnold on Fuel Cell Power Plants Are Used in Diverse Ways Across the United States
  • BobMeinetz on The Dangers of Green Technology-Forcing
  • thermoacoustic on Closing Nuclear Reactors in Ohio and Pennsylvania Will Thwart Climate Goals

Recent Posts

  • Good Morning Vietnam, Energy-wise
  • What Is A ‘Fair’ Price For Oil?
  • A Key Hurdle to Modi’s Rural Electrification Scheme is the Paperwork

Useful Pages

  • Terms of Use
  • Comments Policy
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Help
  • About and Contact Us
Copyright © 2018 Energy Central. All Rights Reserved
This site uses cookies, for a number of reasons. By continuing to use this website you accept the use of cookies. Find out more.