We appreciate your comment and share your desire for TheEnergyCollective.com to be a place of reasoned and thoughtful analysis of the key issues facing the energy sector.
However, in this case, I think your worries may be a bit unwarranted. As you know, we publish a wide range of views, opinions, and analysis on this site, from everyone from the Natural Resources Defense Council to solar industry professionals to nuclear engineers to the American Petroleum Institute. We're committed to this diversity of views, as we believe it is key to fostering a rich, informative discussion for our readers on the full spectrum of energy-related topics.
In this case, you clearly disagree with the content or implications of these infographics. Like all infographics, they present a particular set of information, much of which is informative, but at a level of abstraction that clearly cannot convey the full story. Luckily, our readers, including you and Nathan, are well equipped to add a richer discussion to the comments on these posts.
That said, I see only one factual error in these infographics: the comparison of 10 GW of solar to 12.5 coal plants on an "energy generation equivalent." Clearly the graphic's creators must have meant on a capacity equivalent, not an annual energy generation equivalent, which is more like 2-4 coal plants worth as you note, after accounting for capacity factors.
Most of the other issues you raise are either differences of opinion or further details and nuances not captured in the article. That's exactly what the comments section here is for, and you've successfully started a great conversation about the full picture on solar energy.
Thanks for your contributions to the Energy Collective. All the best,
Digital Strategy Consultant