Solar Deployment: Are There Limits as Costs Come Down?
A kWh is a different product depending on when and where it is delivered. The rapid fall in the costs of solar PV implies that building grids, storage and commercial arrangements able to match supply and demand is much more urgent. This will require strong policy drivers.
Falling costs are making solar PV increasingly competitive with other forms of electricity generation. This post looks at what might limit solar PV’s deployment if costs continue to fall and reach levels low enough to allow for additional expenditure on grids, storage and demand-side infrastructure while remaining economically competitive. I’m not taking a view on if or when this will happen, or how low costs might become – there is still a significant way to go to reach that point. I’m simply looking at what the remaining barriers would be if they did. I’ll use some rough and ready numbers to look at what it might take for solar to produce around a third of the world’s electricity consumption. I’ll assume this illustratively to be about 17,000TWh (out of a total of around 50,000TWh) by mid-century, which would be around 180 times the 2012 total of around 93TWh of solar PV output.
As has often been noted, the solar resource is easily large enough to provide such large amounts of electricity. Recent data from the US National Renewable Energy Laboratories (NREL) shows average US output of 70kWh/m2 based on total site area (i.e. not only the panels). Generating 17,000TWh on this basis (likely a conservative assumption, as panel efficiency is likely to increase over time) would require an area of around 240,000km2, less than 0.2% of the world’s land surface. This is a huge area – about the size of the United Kingdom – but far less than the land devoted to agriculture, which uses solar energy to grow food. And solar power can often make use of spaces – such as rooftops and deserts – that have few alternative uses. Local planning and environmental concerns seem likely to become a more prominent issue as solar deployment grows. However these concerns seem unlikely to place a fundamental limit on the industry globally.
A solar industry meeting a third of world electricity demand would be very large, but not infeasibly so. It would require about 300GW of capacity to be added each year on average worldwide, around 10 times the 2012 installation rate, which has grown to its current level in just a few years.
However, matching the location and timing of supply to demand is a huge challenge. Electricity at a different time and place is a different product and so part of a separate market. Grids and storage help link these different markets and so minimise load shedding (though some may still be required).
The first problem is geographical proximity. In some cases (such as California and Mexico) demand is quite close to high quality solar resources. However in densely populated countries with weak solar resources, such as the UK, the challenge is much greater. Electricity may need to be brought from sunnier regions, especially in winter, requiring large scale transmission infrastructure. There may be more local issues. For example in Japan, grid reinforcement will be needed to bring power from the north to more populous areas, crossing boundaries between regional utilities. However problems in this respect may not be universal. One recent study indicated that the German grid is already quite robust.
Matching the timing of output and demand is even more problematic. Solar output is much peakier than system demand, and peak output and demand will often not coincide. One indication is that load balancing becomes a significant problem when solar begins to account for more than around 10-15% of generation.
As solar penetration increases relative prices at different times of day are likely to shift, which may well cause demand to respond. More sophisticated market arrangements and system operation are likely to become important features of most scenarios with extensive penetration of renewables.
Matching the timing of peaks by moving power from where the sun is shining to where the demand is located could imply tens or hundreds of GW of power needing to be moved across continental distances. This is because the point at which the sun is highest in the sky (around noon), when solar output tends to be at its maximum, moves quite quickly across the surface of the earth. At the equator it travels at just over 1000miles/hour, implying that to service demand even an hour later in the day power must be moved hundreds of miles from west to east. The chart below shows how far west you need to go to shift the time of peak one hour later at the latitudes of some of the world’s major cities. To move the peak a quarter of the day – from a noon production peak to 6pm demand – you need to move power a quarter of the way round the world. And the direction does not always help. To meet later demand on the US west coast solar panels would need to be out in the Pacific Ocean rather than Arizona and Texas (though putting more west facing panels in California itself may help some). China, with its population concentrated on the east coast, is better served in the evening, but would run into problems in the morning. This implies that load balancing using transmission will be a huge challenge from a technological, regulatory and commercial perspective.
Solar production needs to be hundreds of miles west to meet a demand peak one hour later in the day at the latitude of the world’s major cities…
Even the most extensive links may not be enough on occasions when the sun is over the oceans. The map below shows where the sun is shining at midnight GMT on 21st December. There is an hour or so of setting winter sun still left on the US west coast, and the weak first hour or two of the day’s output from panels in east Asia, with Australia in daylight (and therefore with some intriguing export possibilities if links can be built far enough). But the whole of Europe, Africa, the Middle East, India, and almost all of Russia and North and South America and a good deal of the rest of Asia are in darkness.
Building storage to address this problem is challenging because of the huge scale needed, as well as because of the cost. The subject is too large to go into here in detail, although at least one recent study shows storage to be crucial for solar deployment in North America. In northern Europe very large amounts of storage are required even to balance load within the day. Seasonal storage (because for example average intensity of sunlight in the UK is nine times higher in summer than in winter) would require enormous capacity. Germany’s subsidy for storage as part of new residential PV systems, which was introduced in May, and California’s plan for 1300MW of storage by 2020 are early examples of the type of initiative that is likely to be required. Among other effects the premium for hydro power for load balancing is likely to increase. And reductions in load factor due to no storage being available, and so surplus remaining unused at peak, will be less of a problem the lower the capital costs of solar become.
Building transmission and storage infrastructure, along with the arrangements to manage them, will take decades at the scale required. And getting the costs of storage down will also be hugely challenging. This will be accompanied by the need to make significant changesto market mechanisms so that they can more effectively balance supply and demand. None of this will be achieved easily, and strong policy drivers are likely to be required for this to happen as fast as now looks likely to be required if solar is to play a central role in decarbonising power systems.
Few expected solar to become quite so cost competitive quite so quickly. This largely unanticipated increase in competitiveness leads to a similarly accelerated programme now being required to build grids and storage able to incorporate increasingly large amounts of solar into the world’s power systems.
 This is broadly similar to Shell’s Oceans Scenario, which shows 20,800 TWh of solar generation, 36% of a total of 57,800TWh. The total consumption considered here is based on an extrapolation to 2050 of the IEA’s New Policies scenario for 2035 to 2050. This may be higher with increased electrification of end use. It may be lower with greater efficiency, but in any case only intended to indicate order of magnitude. See http://s01.static-shell.com/content/dam/shell-new/local/corporate/Scenarios/Downloads/Scenarios_newdoc.pdf
 Source BP Statistical Review of world energy, 2013
 Consumers cannot readily substitute between consumption in different places and at different times – you need electricity in your living room now, and electricity in someone else’s living room later is not the same product. A hypothetical monopolist could profitably impose a small but significant non-transitory increase in price, implying that the markets are separate.
 David MacKay. Solar energy in the context of energy use, energy transportation ans energy storage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Vol 371,number 1996.
 See reference 3 above for a discussion of this point.
Other Posts by Adam Whitmore
|More coming soon...|
The Energy Collective
- Rod Adams
- Scott Edward Anderson
- a b
- Charles Barton
- Barry Brook
- Steven Cohen
- Dick DeBlasio
- Senator Pete Domenici
- Simon Donner
- Big Gav
- Michael Giberson
- Kirsty Gogan
- James Greenberger
- Lou Grinzo
- Tyler Hamilton
- Christine Hertzog
- David Hone
- Gary Hunt
- Jesse Jenkins
- Sonita Lontoh
- Rebecca Lutzy
- Jesse Parent
- Jim Pierobon
- Vicky Portwain
- Tom Raftery
- Joseph Romm
- Robert Stavins
- Robert Stowe
- Geoffrey Styles
- Alex Trembath
- Gernot Wagner